briwayjones
Manual Master
- Joined
- December 11, 2003
- Messages
- 4,460
- Reaction score
- 7
- Location
- Maryland, USA
- City, State
- Eldersburg, MD
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2000 Ford Explorer XLS
Personally I think the traditional IFS system on the second gen. Explorers are completely pointless and holds no advantage over the TTB of the first gen. Explorers. Due to the sway bars which keeps the independent suspensions from working independently and completely defeats the purpose of having independent suspension. In fact I have owned both first and second gen. Explorers and I think the first gen. Explorers ride less harshly than the second gens. Of course you could remove the sway bar but then you have excessive body roll.
So I was thinking. What if you could replace the sway bar end links with a shock of sorts about the same length. And put a limiting strap on it so that it couldn't down travel too far and rip the shock apart. But that way it could have up travel and let the suspension work independently yet the sway bar would still do it's job and function like it's supposed to. Or you could possibly replace the end links with a coil spring of the proper length also.
The question is, is there even any shocks or coil springs in existence that would fit the bill and work for this?
So I was thinking. What if you could replace the sway bar end links with a shock of sorts about the same length. And put a limiting strap on it so that it couldn't down travel too far and rip the shock apart. But that way it could have up travel and let the suspension work independently yet the sway bar would still do it's job and function like it's supposed to. Or you could possibly replace the end links with a coil spring of the proper length also.
The question is, is there even any shocks or coil springs in existence that would fit the bill and work for this?