Actually, on a second thought, the question of restoring vs. preserving should lead to an interesting discussion.
Going back over some thirty some years of my life span, I have been confronted by this question several times. I have restored a 1972 BMW 75/5 to original state, have kept a bunch of Citroen CX as original as possible (was a sucker for the 82 ashtray though), fixed up a lot of Mercedes 114/5 for inspection (was my college time), got plenty of Fords from the junk yard to sell them to Turkey (was my vacation - Turkey is a beautiful country)...
Now I own a Navajo. Wikipedia tells me that there were only 9000 made of them. For me, that seems to be a perfect restoration object. However, I got that thing for 1100 bucks (the tank was full) with plenty of rust, an erratic front suspension and a creative re-wiring/vacuum line run.
Problems: I'm living on a tiny island in the middle of the Pacific (shipping!), I haven't opened the hood of a car for nearly 20 years, original parts are getting scarce, does the Navajo have some status in the automotive history like a Citroen CX or a Mercedes 114/5 (the last Mercedes ever built), should I get Ford cosmetics (grille, headlights, badges,...) on it, etc.?
I'll preserve it, but I would love to restore it, but the question is also, is it worth it?
What, besides becoming the
#1 selling SUV, is the importance of the Gen.1 Explorer/Navajo in car history? Would it be worth it to really restore it (I'm an originality purist)?
On the other hand, I wouldn't mind to preserve it as kinda rat truck.