yeah i got rid of mine. its all just a gimmick. i hear now even mopeds have computers WTF?
Gimmick? Nope.
later, in that same vehicle, i was flying down a sandy river bed (at about 60mph) and there was a tree fallen across it, i slammed the brakes but of course ABS kicked in (preventing the wheels from locking up and digging into the sand like a normal vehicle) and so i crashed through the fallen tree... which turned out to be pretty fun.. but yeah... after that i disabled the ABS.
my explorer's ABS failed on my g/f while she was driving it, shortly after we got it, luckily there weren't many cars around so she had time to steer... i disabled it after that.
You have described one of but two circumstances where it's possible for a non-ABS vehicle to out-stop an ABS-equipped vehicle. Loose, soft snow and loose/soft gravel. In both those conditions, a non-ABS-equipped vehicle with locked wheels will push up a mound of dirt/snow in front of the tires, essentially digging-in and stopping faster than an ABS-equipped vehicle which unlocks the tires just before that mound has a chance to form. However, those are the only two circumstances where a non-ABS vehicle has a *slight* advantage in ONLY a straight-line panic-stop situation. The fact that your girlfriend's car was able to steer around the vehicle she nearly hit doesn't sound like a failure of the system, it sounds like the system performed exactly as it's supposed to (i.e. provides CONTROL).
Contrary to what you may *think* was a controlled stop in your two scenarios (the Topaz and the Mustang) the fact of the matter is that you were already out of control. The ability to lock the brakes simply allowed the vehicle to continue on it's
uncontrolled path, which just happened to be an OK thing to have happen in those two circumstances. However, those circumstances are the exception, not the rule. (and if they're the rule, please don't drive behind me... or anywhere near me, for that matter!
)
The fact of the matter is that an ABS-equipped vehicle can and will out-stop 99.9% of the driving population driving the exact same non-ABS vehicle 99.9% of the time. As someone mentioned earlier, the main purpose is to allow the driver to bring the vehicle to a CONTROLLED stop. Neither of your two skidding situations was a controlled stop. IIRC, AAA put out a commercial a few years back about the three S's: Stop, Stay, and Steer. That's what ABS is designed to give you the ability to do: Bring the vehicle to a controlled stop. When you're skidding, you're not in control, plain and simple.
ABS doesn't re-write the laws of physics. It just helps you better-utilize them.
Speaking of which, the advantage in the dirt and snow of a non-ABS vehicle may have disappeared. The Bosch system in the new Ford F150 SVT Raptor utilizes a completely different algorhythm for the ABS to determine when the vehicle is off-road, and adjusts the wheel speed thresholds to tolerate more wheel lockup and greater wheel speed differences before it kicks in. That's essential when crawling the rocks, or in high-speed desert running.... And from what I understand (I have a friend that was involved in some of the design and testing) the system works surprisingly well.