Robert
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- October 26, 1999
- Messages
- 3,948
- Reaction score
- 4
- Location
- CA
- City, State
- Kelseyville, CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '13 Ram 1500 Longhorn
Having had a '94 OHV that I only kept for 24K miles and now currently have a '97 SOHC, I would without a doubt go for the '97 SOHC. Try and find out when the SOHC was sold new so you will know if it is still covered under ONP 00M12 for noisy tensioners. It is still covered under ONP 01M01 regardless since it is for 7 years 100K miles. If the chain guides develop noise within the next year or so, you can get the replaced at no charge. If the tensioners haven't been updated and develop the rattle, it's a $250 fix if the '97 SOHC is more than 6 years old. The price difference between the two engines was $400 new. There is no proof that the OHV is a more reliable engine either. It's been out seven years longer than the SOHC. It's true the SOHC has some issues with noisy tensioners and chain guides but as long as Ford fixes them under warranty it isn't that big of an issue. I've seen an equal number of issues with the OHV as well, one of which is an annoying ping-type sound. I have 104K on my SOHC and had my tensioners replaced at around 50K. My engine is still as quiet as it was new. It doesn't burn a drop of oil during it's 3K-5K oil change interval and still gets mileage that is better than new. I only had my '94 OHV for 24K miles, however it did need a new O2 sensor at 24K. When I went to pick it up from the Service Department, I spotted a nice '95 V8 T-bird I wanted so I traded for it a couple of days later.
For another $300, 45 more HP, 25 more ft./lbs. of torque and 26K less miles to me it's a no-brainer. As a SOHC owner, I have no concerns with regards to its reliability whether it's proven or not.
For another $300, 45 more HP, 25 more ft./lbs. of torque and 26K less miles to me it's a no-brainer. As a SOHC owner, I have no concerns with regards to its reliability whether it's proven or not.