lester
Member
- Joined
- October 30, 2003
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Central, Ohio
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 93 Sport
Are performance upgrades for the 4.0 real?
Specifically, the high dollar air intake and chips.
The air intake re-routes the air from the cold air source infront of the radiator to the hot air source inside the engine compartment. Seems to defy logic that this would be of any positive value... then of course theres the high cost of these "upgrades" from any one of five or six different sources. The reason I ask is a friend at work who has a year newer Sport with the same setup was talking about how his mpg and overall performance seemed to have gone downhill. Talking about it with him he mentioned the last thing he changed was the intake. He had switched from the stock unit to a K&N unit. I suggested he switch back and see what happened. Sure enough his mpg and low and midrange performance jumped back to where he stated it was before making the change.
Later he mentions he had done the same thing to her Sport and when he switched it back it still did not seem to run as well as his. A day or so later he mentioed he had fixed the problem. He applied the same thinking to her vehicle as his and backed off the Jet chip he had installed.
Seems like he has about $600 worth of upgrades that don't upgrade. Both of his units have flowmaster cat backs. Both of these seem to be well maintained units.
For some reason these upgrades seem to be hit or miss. I've read on this board where these things have made a big difference then there are situations where they have not.
Whats the real story?
Thanks.
Specifically, the high dollar air intake and chips.
The air intake re-routes the air from the cold air source infront of the radiator to the hot air source inside the engine compartment. Seems to defy logic that this would be of any positive value... then of course theres the high cost of these "upgrades" from any one of five or six different sources. The reason I ask is a friend at work who has a year newer Sport with the same setup was talking about how his mpg and overall performance seemed to have gone downhill. Talking about it with him he mentioned the last thing he changed was the intake. He had switched from the stock unit to a K&N unit. I suggested he switch back and see what happened. Sure enough his mpg and low and midrange performance jumped back to where he stated it was before making the change.
Later he mentions he had done the same thing to her Sport and when he switched it back it still did not seem to run as well as his. A day or so later he mentioed he had fixed the problem. He applied the same thinking to her vehicle as his and backed off the Jet chip he had installed.
Seems like he has about $600 worth of upgrades that don't upgrade. Both of his units have flowmaster cat backs. Both of these seem to be well maintained units.
For some reason these upgrades seem to be hit or miss. I've read on this board where these things have made a big difference then there are situations where they have not.
Whats the real story?
Thanks.