Front driveshaft upgrade | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

Front driveshaft upgrade

Mesozoic

Well-Known Member
Joined
October 3, 2015
Messages
443
Reaction score
199
City, State
Tucson, AZ
Year, Model & Trim Level
'00 Mercury Mountaineer
So after 10,000 miles of driving my upgraded '00 Mounty, the front shaft (which was rebuilt with new CV and U-joints) has munched the boot on the CV and spewing grease everywhere. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to remedy/upgrade it so that it can handle the slight additional abuse it receives with a high performance powerplant driving it? I'm sticking with the 4404 t-case (AWD). Enjoying it, thoroughly.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





It isn’t extra torque or power that shreds the boot. Either the boot is old and dries out and cracks, road debris gets it, or it’s installed wrong.
 






I don't think there's anything particularly challenging about front shaft installation, but maybe some debris nailed it and tore it? Not sure... I do use my truck offroad from time to time (mild, forest service roads), but nothing crazy. I have an old 70s Bronco for the rough stuff. I'm curious if anyone has upgraded their front shaft in any way from the stock design with a silly boot covering the CV.
 






The boot cracks from time to time, you can't do anything against it.
Maybe cheap rubber, not really grease resistant or the clamp was too tight.
Get a new one and hope for the best.


defekt.JPG


Maybe it's possible to get a double cardan style like this.
 






I would bet on some kind of debris got the boot, if it was replaced before with the CV joint. I've only had one boot tear, and it was likely the original on my last 98.

I plan to upgrade too someday, but the choices are very few from what I've seen. Nobody makes anything special for these trucks. The old 4WD swap project used an earlier Explorer front shaft without the CV joint, but some have reported vibrations. I think the joint angles are a good question to research before making a new design shaft. I will also want a stronger shaft, and the later trucks all used double CV joints with 8.8 front diff's. So it is a tough subject, to upgrade the front shaft. I'm not sure what the best path will be.

For yours I'd stick with a stock type, it's just fine for anything up to moderate power and rpm's, which is where you are now. If you will push 500hp or more, then more strength would be a good upgrade.

Here's one other thing to watch, keep an eye on the differential bushings, the rear one specifically, and the frame mount for that. Watch for any excess looseness of that bushing, the bolt, or cracking of the frame bracket. My bracket there cracked and eventually broke loose. I think the large forces at launch are high enough that it might eventually break the welds of that bracket. Mine did that, the mileage was about 260k then. I think that could be why the last versions of the chassis(late Rangers and Sport Trac), they have a longer diff/bracket so they mount farther back on the frame. I plan to upgrade to that bracket on my project truck.
 






Somewhere out there in ranger aftermarket land this part exists

IMG_5384.jpeg


IMG_5383.jpeg


IMG_5382.jpeg


This part converts your ball type cv flange to a true double cardan joint
I have found it before on the internet it is built for lifted rangers and explorers

Might be worth a shot having a front d shaft made with one of these even if you keep it simple with two u joints… only lifted trucks need the double cardan


Found it
 






I saw that six bolt flange adapter also way back when I had one made locally to use a normal u-joint. That one was even a Dana part I didn't know about when I had my local shop make one from thick steel. I think it was around $150 back in the 2006 era. I'd try that to stick with a double cardon joint, I think the u-joint angle thing is more complicated than typical theory.
 












$165 sheesh
 






Featured Content

Back
Top