VW new concept car | Ford Explorer Forums - Serious Explorations

  • Register Today It's free!

VW new concept car

EliteConcept

Explorer Addict
Joined
June 5, 2001
Messages
4,049
Reaction score
0
City, State
LaPorte, Indiana
Year, Model & Trim Level
04 Civic LX
just wondering if anyone eles has heard about this....i saw it on CNN the other day..
i guess the car itself weighs in at about 550 lbs, and gets about 235 miles per gallon

just thought this was kinda intresting....
but man that car would suck in the snow!
can you imange trying to drive in 1 inch of snow with that?
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year.
Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





I remember seeing something about that, I looked at the screen and thought it was a typo, maybe not?
 






Great, more parts we have to sell here at Motorworks.:eek:
 






550lbs that doesnt seem to big maybe i can part my truck up on top of it. :)
 






you can find more info about it at popular science's website. Its a two seater, one seat in front and one in back, its about 4 feet wide, and yeah, 235 miles to the gallon, but the gas tank only holds 2 gallons :p Owning one of those suckers would definitely make the gas mileage on the ex more affordable, on average you'd be getting over 100 mpg per car!
 






Dead Link Removed


To listen to automakers snipe about tightening fuel economy standards, you'd think it impossible to squeeze more miles from a barrel of Extract of Arabia. This, of course, is not the case, particularly if you design a vehicle expressly to drive far and drink little.

Forget power, space, and speed: Volkswagen AG's latest idea-on-wheels does not address the requirements of the average American family driver. What it can do is travel more than 100 kilometers on a single liter of fuel. Translation: 235 miles per gallon.

The car's designers combined highly tuned aerodynamics, exotic materials, and a 0.3-liter diesel engine to achieve 0.99 liters per 100 kilometers. The project, the brainchild of engineer Thomas Gänsicke, is an engineering exercise and therefore has rather whimsical features. Most noticeable are the car's canoe-like proportions: It's 4 feet wide and 11 feet long. Occupants sit tandem, the passenger straddling the driver's seat, both wedged under a 4-foot-long gullwing canopy.

Three video cameras eliminate the mileage-reducing wind drag of rearview mirrors. Wheels are faired in, side-cooling air inlets open only when necessary, and even the keylocks have been replaced by a proximity unlocking system. The resulting coefficient of drag is 0.159, compared with 0.30 or so for most production cars.

The slinky carbon-fiber bodywork covering the magnesium frame is just the beginning of the unobtainium-based technology used throughout. The front suspension is a combination of titanium, aluminum, magnesium, and ceramics and weighs less than 18 pounds. The single-cylinder four-stroke engine has monoblock construction—there's no separate cylinder head—and is all aluminum. Fuel is atomized directly into the cylinder at 28,000 psi. Two overhead camshafts operate the one exhaust and two inlet valves. The fuel pump is magnesium, the exhaust system titanium.

The engine produces a thundering 8.5 horsepower and weighs only 57 pounds. It conspires with a 6-speed gearbox—magnesium housing, hollow shafts, titanium bolts—to pinch miles from the diesel fuel. The transmission shifts electronically, killing the engine when an onboard computer foresees an inkling of fuel savings. A starter-generator, with energy stored in nickel-metal batteries, rekindles the engine as necessary.

Because the electric motor only restarts the engine, the 1-liter car is not a hybrid. Gänsicke explains that if fuel economy wasn't paramount, the motor could be used to increase horsepower and torque by 30 percent. "But that's not the effect we wanted." In fact, he's not terribly specific about performance, other than to say that top speed exceeds 70 mph and that it's "not very quick in accelerating."

It can, he promises, "swim with the usual traffic." Who better to emphasize that point than Ferdinand Piëch, chairman of VW? For the most recent board meeting in April, Piëch drove the 1-liter car from Wolfsburg to Hamburg, 110 miles, averaging 264 miles per gallon on the way. That works out to an ultra-miserly 0.89 liters per 100 kilometers.

Of course, "0.89-liter car" doesn't quite have the same ring.


SIZING UP THE SMALL FRIES
How VW's 1-liter machine stacks up against the shortest-wheelbase vehicle on American roads today, the Mazda Miata.

VW 1-Liter Car

Length: 143.7 in.
Width: 49.1 in.
Height: 43.7 in.
Weight: 588 pounds
Peak Power: 8.5 hp
Fuel Capacity: 1.7 gal.
Mileage: 235 mpg

Mazda Miata

Length: 155.3 in.
Width: 66.0 in.
Height: 48.4 in.
Weight: 2,387 pounds
Peak Power: 142 hp
Fuel Capacity: 12.7 gal.
Mileage: 29 mpg
 












Of course, until they have everyone driving these things, in an accident I'd much rather be the Explorer than the VW...

Its been a while since physics, but...
Lets see, 500lb VW traveling at 60 mph collides head on with a 4500lbs Explorer at 60 mph. VW velocity*weight is 30000, X velocity*weight is 270000.
270000-30000= 240000.
Divide that by the now combined weight of both vehicles (5000lbs)
240000/5000lbs = 48

In other words, the Explorer would continue moving at 48 mph regardless of the fact that it just hit a vw concept car...
 






Thats some questionable math if you ask me. :) But it kinda reminds me of an RTI ramp.
 






Thats not questionable math...
weight*speed of object 1 + weight*(-)speed of object 2 (one of these object's speeds has to be negative because they are traveling towards each other). This gives you a number that is kinetic energy. Divide that by how much this new object (object1 +object2) weights, and you get the result of that kinetic energy. A heavy object strikes a light object, both going the same speed, the heavy object carries more energy.

look it up on google.
 












Back
Top