-
Ford Explorer Community - Maintenance - Modifications - Performance Upgrades - Problem Solving - Off-Road - Street
Explorer Forum Covers the Explorer ST, Explorer Sport, Explorer Sport Trac, Lincoln Aviator,
Mercury Mountaineer, Mazda Navajo, Ford Ranger, Mazda Pickups, and the Ford Aerostar
Register Today It's free!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jrgaylor's 91 Explorer full width D44/9
- Thread starter jrgaylor
- Start date
Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!.
splodo49
Ejection seat man..
- Joined
- June 17, 2003
- Messages
- 712
- Reaction score
- 3
- City, State
- Tooele,Utah
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 94 XLT,75 FJ, 05 Cummins
questions
Hey thanks you just answered a whole bunch of questions with those pics.What degree of bushings are you using and those are the f-150 coil buckets right. I read somewhere that if you get the f-100 buckets you dont have to space them out. I found some on a old econoline but they looked kinda like the explorers buckets so i didnt get them.. Im thinkin about going with 1/4 ellipticals up front instead of coils what you think about that?O yeah did you move the axle foward any? and did you get rid of your tranny crossmember and just use your newly fabbed one? Thanks.
Hey thanks you just answered a whole bunch of questions with those pics.What degree of bushings are you using and those are the f-150 coil buckets right. I read somewhere that if you get the f-100 buckets you dont have to space them out. I found some on a old econoline but they looked kinda like the explorers buckets so i didnt get them.. Im thinkin about going with 1/4 ellipticals up front instead of coils what you think about that?O yeah did you move the axle foward any? and did you get rid of your tranny crossmember and just use your newly fabbed one? Thanks.
jrgaylor
Elite Explorer
- Joined
- April 15, 2002
- Messages
- 2,765
- Reaction score
- 37
- City, State
- Washington
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1985 BroncoII
The Bushings I am using came with the truck when I go it, it was already lifted. I have yet to put it on a machine to get the current alignment specs but the bushings that were on the axle when I got it were 7.5* I have more caster than what I want, I am going to be getting rubber bushings for the radius arms (polys seem to stiff) and new c- bushings with less caster.
jrgaylor
Elite Explorer
- Joined
- April 15, 2002
- Messages
- 2,765
- Reaction score
- 37
- City, State
- Washington
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1985 BroncoII
splodo49 said:You didnt have to space the radius arms out from the frame?
I did not lengthin my wheelbase, if anything it is a itty bit shorter now.
I also bent each radius arm a little for better angle at the radius arm bracket.
Where I put my radius arm brackets is just about where the frame starts to get narrow.
BigDave!!!
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- June 26, 2004
- Messages
- 1,234
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- San Diego,CA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 97 XLT 2WD
truck looks great and looks like it works a lot better with those new axles
scootr2200
Member
- Joined
- July 4, 2005
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Western NC
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1986 Ranger
This might have been covered a 10000x times, but what options would one have for rear axles? I've got a Ranger and want to run 46's on it with a FW SAS and I'm thinking that I'm going to have to cut off my hangers and run F150 springs. And the same with the front... what coil can be used to get enough lift to clear 46's?
Sorry for the newbe questions.
Mickey
Sorry for the newbe questions.

Mickey
mitch
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- January 2, 2004
- Messages
- 379
- Reaction score
- 1
- City, State
- high point, NC (home) charlotte, NC (school)
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 94 limited
first of all no coil could be found that high, you would have to have them specaily made, but why do that when coil-overs are far better. Also if you are planning to run the ranger on the street 44s are the tallest you can go. I dont even think they sale 46s correct me if im wrong. also both the front and rear axels would have to be huge like dana 60s, 70s, or even 80s and to turn that much tire you would need a huge engine like 400+ hp and even more torque or a ridiculously low gear ratio 6.18+. Not to mention the cost of something on the scale of this. Im not trying to kill your dream but tell u of all the things you are going to have to do. btw try for a smaller dream
jrgaylor
Elite Explorer
- Joined
- April 15, 2002
- Messages
- 2,765
- Reaction score
- 37
- City, State
- Washington
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1985 BroncoII
scootr2200 said:This might have been covered a 10000x times, but what options would one have for rear axles? I've got a Ranger and want to run 46's on it with a FW SAS and I'm thinking that I'm going to have to cut off my hangers and run F150 springs. And the same with the front... what coil can be used to get enough lift to clear 46's?
Sorry for the newbe questions.
Mickey
46's ??? that is Dana 60/14 bolt + territory
93liftedXLT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- February 18, 2005
- Messages
- 609
- Reaction score
- 2
- City, State
- left coast
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 92 xlt
BADASS MAN 

scootr2200
Member
- Joined
- July 4, 2005
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Western NC
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1986 Ranger
Yeah, I'll be getting beefy axles... hopefully from a friends '77 F150 that's on 44" Boggers now. I'm just wondering what leafs will work well in the rear and what coils work well up front.
Mickey
Mickey
dreamr
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- October 5, 2003
- Messages
- 3,619
- Reaction score
- 13
- City, State
- Lynnwood WA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 99 XL / 4x4 / 4.0 ohv
scootr2200 said:Yeah, I'll be getting beefy axles... hopefully from a friends '77 F150 that's on 44" Boggers now. I'm just wondering what leafs will work well in the rear and what coils work well up front.
Mickey
Correct me if I am wrong but the f150 had a d44 and 9". Personally I don't think they will handle the 44+" tires for very long if taken off the hiway. Hell they may grenade on the hiway.
Now for lift to accomodate that much tire on a ranger, I am thinking you may just have to remove the fenders up front, add a narrow flat bed to the rear, and a bit of tube work.
- Joined
- June 24, 2003
- Messages
- 3,838
- Reaction score
- 101
- City, State
- Newcastle Wa
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- White 94 Limited
- Callsign
- KG7PKQ
dreamr
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- October 5, 2003
- Messages
- 3,619
- Reaction score
- 13
- City, State
- Lynnwood WA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 99 XL / 4x4 / 4.0 ohv
Albino 94LTD said:NO! They look good white.:navajo:
![]()
You and your white

I think the black would look better.


scootr2200
Member
- Joined
- July 4, 2005
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Western NC
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1986 Ranger
Yeah, black would look hot.
He was running the D44 with the 44's for a long time and he recently upgraded to a D60. I'm sorry, I'm just not giving enough information with my posts. lol
Either way, what springs and coils are available to get enough lift? Or am I better off saving up my pennies and going with a 4 link front and rear with coil overs, which I wouldn't really like to do now?
Mickey
He was running the D44 with the 44's for a long time and he recently upgraded to a D60. I'm sorry, I'm just not giving enough information with my posts. lol
Either way, what springs and coils are available to get enough lift? Or am I better off saving up my pennies and going with a 4 link front and rear with coil overs, which I wouldn't really like to do now?
Mickey
Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 2,012
- Replies
- 216
- Views
- 36,933