JDookie
Member
- Joined
- January 7, 2013
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- New Orleans, LA
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 2013 Explorer Sport
I just received and installed the Lund Racing tunes a couple days ago, and am noticing a couple things that I'm not sure about. First, let me just say that this is not by any means intended to be a bash session against Lund Racing. I am VERY happy with the overall performance gains, and driveability of these tunes, I am just trying to see if my issues and concerns are being experienced by anyone else, and trying to find out if they should even be concerns at all before I contact Lund Racing about any of this.
First up is Reverse. I am noticing that if I switch to Reverse and try to back up instantly without giving it a few seconds to "adjust" the car will stutter real bad, and in some cases won't move at all. I actually went to back out of parking space today, and switched to Reverse right after I started the engine, and tried to immediately back up just like I've done without issue for the past four months, and the car wouldn't move at all. It just sat there stumbling on itself not matter how much throttle I gave it. I had to go back to Neutral, wait a second, go back to Reverse, wait a second, and then everything was finally normal. This actually happens about a 1 out of every four times I try to back up, and it's extremely annoying.
Next is shifting. Under full WOT acceleration, I am noticing an extremely hard/fast shift, almost feeling instant with a very hard metal to metal *bang* during gear change. I never thought a transmission could shift *too* fast, but I am thinking this one might be. I am also noticing that during normal driving, if I accelerate to merge into freeway traffic or something bringing up the rpm's, and then quickly letting off the throttle, the transmission will give the same bang when it shifts. Now, even though I think it's amazing, and I love it from a racing perspective, is this healthy for the transmission and the associated components?
I have noticed all of this in both, the 91 octane and the 93 octane daily driver tunes. I haven't tried the SS tune yet, but I can only assume its at least the same or worse, which is fine though because the SS tune is *supposed* to be extreme, so all of this would almost be expected, which brings me to my next point.
What would I like Lund to do about this??
Well, in my opinion, I am thinking that I could do completely without the 91 octane tune all together. For my "personal" use, 93 octane fuel is readily available with no issue, and if I travel, I plan on returning the car back to stock anyway, so fuel won't be a concern. What I'd like to see in place of the 91 octane tune is a more mild 93 octane daily driver tune maybe keeping all the engine mods, but taming down the transmission mods. I don't need a race car shift during a 1-hour commute to work, and I could even live with more torque management, which I'm sure is the cause of the Reverse issue. This "mild" 93 octane tune would be for when my wife uses the car all week, and the current 93 octane and SS tunes will be for me on the weekends.
What is everyone's thoughts on all of this?
First up is Reverse. I am noticing that if I switch to Reverse and try to back up instantly without giving it a few seconds to "adjust" the car will stutter real bad, and in some cases won't move at all. I actually went to back out of parking space today, and switched to Reverse right after I started the engine, and tried to immediately back up just like I've done without issue for the past four months, and the car wouldn't move at all. It just sat there stumbling on itself not matter how much throttle I gave it. I had to go back to Neutral, wait a second, go back to Reverse, wait a second, and then everything was finally normal. This actually happens about a 1 out of every four times I try to back up, and it's extremely annoying.
Next is shifting. Under full WOT acceleration, I am noticing an extremely hard/fast shift, almost feeling instant with a very hard metal to metal *bang* during gear change. I never thought a transmission could shift *too* fast, but I am thinking this one might be. I am also noticing that during normal driving, if I accelerate to merge into freeway traffic or something bringing up the rpm's, and then quickly letting off the throttle, the transmission will give the same bang when it shifts. Now, even though I think it's amazing, and I love it from a racing perspective, is this healthy for the transmission and the associated components?
I have noticed all of this in both, the 91 octane and the 93 octane daily driver tunes. I haven't tried the SS tune yet, but I can only assume its at least the same or worse, which is fine though because the SS tune is *supposed* to be extreme, so all of this would almost be expected, which brings me to my next point.
What would I like Lund to do about this??
Well, in my opinion, I am thinking that I could do completely without the 91 octane tune all together. For my "personal" use, 93 octane fuel is readily available with no issue, and if I travel, I plan on returning the car back to stock anyway, so fuel won't be a concern. What I'd like to see in place of the 91 octane tune is a more mild 93 octane daily driver tune maybe keeping all the engine mods, but taming down the transmission mods. I don't need a race car shift during a 1-hour commute to work, and I could even live with more torque management, which I'm sure is the cause of the Reverse issue. This "mild" 93 octane tune would be for when my wife uses the car all week, and the current 93 octane and SS tunes will be for me on the weekends.
What is everyone's thoughts on all of this?