SLVRTRC
Active Member
- Joined
- June 19, 2009
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Hermansville MI
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 07 Sport Trac 4.0 XLT 4x4
a explorer is a little more aerodynamically challenged compared to a Mark VII.
i also realize that the pics wont show true mileage it shows a significant drop regardless.
i have said it before my 4.0L mustang got 28mpg all the time trips ranging from 5 miles to 800... doing the math at the pump fill up after fill up. mustang is much more aerodynamic than a barn shaped explorer.
i also realize that the pics wont show true mileage it shows a significant drop regardless.
i have said it before my 4.0L mustang got 28mpg all the time trips ranging from 5 miles to 800... doing the math at the pump fill up after fill up. mustang is much more aerodynamic than a barn shaped explorer.
Please do not rely on the message center information as accurate fuel data. I have owned several Lincolns with the message center, and two Explorers/Mountaineers with it. That is not accurate, it's not even close.
Fuel mileage data must come from longer distances than a mile or two. The only real reliable fuel data is what you get from multiple tank fill ups.
Shoot, I've gotten 28-30mpg going to work in my Mark VII tons of times. Never mind that it's a downhill section and the message center is in error in those light throttle conditions. My real mileage with that car was about 18-21mpg, as documented by recording all fuel tank fill ups and mileage.