itzdiddyo
New Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2020
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- City, State
- Cleveland, Ohio
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1996 Explorer XLT
Hello all. I registered just to throw this out there.
Last summer, i had a similar "crank but no start" situation with my 96 Explorer (4.0L SOHC V6). Short answer, coolant temp sensor. Not sure about the OP's engine, but on mine there are two temp sensors, one for the dash gauge and one for the ECU. They are relatively easy to access and check, simple resistance check should tell you what you need to know. As I recall my new sensor read about 25 Ohms, old part read something way off of that - and the longer I kept the meter attached the higher the value would climb.
My theory is that the bad sensor was sending gibberish to the ECU, and the ECU was interpreting that gibberish as "cold as hell". I believe I read somewhere on the forums at the time that in the absence of good temp data, the ecu will default to an assumed temp of -41°F causing the fuel trim to adjust to richer than Jeff Bezos. Curiously, this did not throw a code.
I discovered this only after borrowing a defective fuel pressure tester from autozone (or maybe the operator was defective?) leading me down the low fuel pressure path and replacing the fuel filter, fuel pump, fuel pressure sensor, checking countless other sensors, electrical connectors and vacuum lines, hitting things with hammers, mass quantities of beer then hitting things with bigger hammers. Then crying myself to sleep. Trust me, this is the short version of the story.
So don't be like me, check your temp sensor or just replace the damn thing, it's only $30 or so at the zone. Maybe this will fix your troubles, maybe not but I hope it helps someone one out there.
-Cheers
Last summer, i had a similar "crank but no start" situation with my 96 Explorer (4.0L SOHC V6). Short answer, coolant temp sensor. Not sure about the OP's engine, but on mine there are two temp sensors, one for the dash gauge and one for the ECU. They are relatively easy to access and check, simple resistance check should tell you what you need to know. As I recall my new sensor read about 25 Ohms, old part read something way off of that - and the longer I kept the meter attached the higher the value would climb.
My theory is that the bad sensor was sending gibberish to the ECU, and the ECU was interpreting that gibberish as "cold as hell". I believe I read somewhere on the forums at the time that in the absence of good temp data, the ecu will default to an assumed temp of -41°F causing the fuel trim to adjust to richer than Jeff Bezos. Curiously, this did not throw a code.
I discovered this only after borrowing a defective fuel pressure tester from autozone (or maybe the operator was defective?) leading me down the low fuel pressure path and replacing the fuel filter, fuel pump, fuel pressure sensor, checking countless other sensors, electrical connectors and vacuum lines, hitting things with hammers, mass quantities of beer then hitting things with bigger hammers. Then crying myself to sleep. Trust me, this is the short version of the story.
So don't be like me, check your temp sensor or just replace the damn thing, it's only $30 or so at the zone. Maybe this will fix your troubles, maybe not but I hope it helps someone one out there.
-Cheers