Trying not to get too-far off-topic....
Here's the way I look at it: If I change my oil every 3000 miles, I'm changing it 33 times per 100,000 miles. If the average cost of oil and a filter is $15, I'm spending $500 on oil and filters per 100,000 miles. Now, if I extend that to 5000 mile intervals, I'm spending $300 per 100k. Is there a savings? Sure... about 40%. However, in real terms, it's $200 saved. If I get ZERO extra life out of the motor by changing the oil more frequently, and the vehicle runs 500,000 miles, I will have spent $1000 extra over the life of the vehicle. That's pennies a day... Cheap insurance in my book, and here's why:
Lets say that (hypothetically-speaking) there is a correlation between oil change frequency and engine life. Say (I'm making these numbers up) that with 5000 mile changes, the engine is good for 300,000 miles, but with 3000 mile intervals, it's good for 500,000 miles (extreme numbers). That means that in order to get the extended life, I spent an extra $1600 over the life of the vehicle. We've all seen that an engine replacement can total that much or more, so I consider the $1600 a cheap investment in my engine's future.
What's that all got to do with synthetic versus dino? You could make a similar argument there... I won't bother... you get the point.
So, getting back to the original question: Yes, you can safely switch back with no problem. As to whether or not it's a worthwhile investment, that's debatable to the end of time. Ask that question in a hundred different forums and you'll get 1000 different opinions. Engines don't particularly care what brand or type of oil you run through them. Pick a flavor of oil and filter you like, change them regularly, and the engine will easily out-last the rest of the vehicle.
(To illustrate that, look at police cars... they regularly go 300K+ before being sold in running condition. They do nothing more than change the oil and filters at regular maintenance intervals per Ford recommendations. That's good enough for me!)