- Joined
- February 9, 1999
- Messages
- 11,923
- Reaction score
- 133
- City, State
- Vail, Arizona
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1992 XLT 4x4
I did mean to change the tire. Because I'm up in the air on whether to go all the way to 33 I decided to run the calculation with 32 for the 4.10 or 33 for the 4.56.
Thought it would keep it all relative, make it a fair"er" fight.
But that's the difference I was trying to point out; if I go just 1" smaller on tire I can get about the same performance as 4.56 with 33s.
Just an idea I was throwing around. I just wondered since I'm shooting for a "best I can do" build if I compromised and went with 32s instead of 33s if I would be happy.
I'm not sure the extra 1" of ground clearance is worth needing to go to a 4.56 or higher.
Like I said before, for around the price of getting 4.56 set up I could swing the 4.10s, and a winch, and a rear locker...It's tempting considering I'm going for a primarily D/D and I'll have to highway travel anytime I want to go off-road.
Thats one of the harder decisions, go 32" now and get the other goodies, or spend the money, get the gears you really want (and tires), then add the goodies later..
As for the difference in height question... The biggest issues we run into when wheeling is that we are still too short (with 33" tires). Its nowhere near as bad as when we ran 32's, but we still run into it.
~Mark