Cobraguy
Explorer Addict
- Joined
- February 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,526
- Reaction score
- 29
- City, State
- Phoenix...Greatest City on Earth
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1995 EB & 1999 EB 5.0
Hello to everyone. I hope I have this thread in the proper location.
I've been lurking around these parts for a while and taking advantage of all the knowledge base here. I finally stepped up and joined not too long ago. I've been a Ford guy all my life...and my mom owned a Ford dealership for many years until she retired and I decided to pursue something different with my life. I wonder about that decision sometimes...
Anyway, I picked up a well used 1995 EB 4X4 with a 4.0 OHV in it. That will just not do. The reason I picked this one up is it was dirt cheap, and is in outstanding condition. 160,000 on the clock and you can eat off the bottom of this thing. You gotta love Arizona... Interior is really good, drives nice, etc. A great place to start...and that's my whole intention of buying it. It's a project. But as you can see by my name, I'm used to just a bit more performance than I have with this thing right now. So here comes the swap. Now, I've done several swaps in my life. Both Ford and GM (mods...please excuse my language and I'll do my best to clean that up in the future) All my conversions have been successful. However, this one is a bit different. I will be going from EEC-IV (OBD-I) to EEC-V (OBD-II). Furthermore, since I live in Arizona, this absolutely needs to be a 100% legal swap. To make it legal, it has to be offered from the factory and EVERYTHING has to be swapped (emissions wise). You can go UP in years, you just can't go down. In otherwords, I can go to a newer calibration than 95. Which is a no brainer since the 5.0 didn't come out until 96. So I'm going to locate and purchase a donor vehicle. Here's where my questions start. I'm not sure what year is the best to go with. I'm thinking a 96 would be the easiest because it's the closest to what I have. But is that true? I also know I'm going to have some interface issues to deal with. For example, the Message Center has a separate wire used for 5.0's. Will I need a 5.0 Message Center? Will the V6 tach work? Or will I need a V8 tach? Maybe just a V8 printed circuit for the cluster? When does PATS get involved? (I should know that one...) Questions, questions...
My goal is somewhere around 280 to 300 hp at the wheels. That should be like falling off a log. A set of AFR 165 or 180 heads, slight cam improvement, headers and exhaust, should get you real close and have impeccable street manners. I don't care what anyone says...AFR makes the best cylinder head for street use there is. Period. I've tried most of them, and they always come out on top. TFS heads are very good, but I've encountered some detonation problems I don't get with AFR's. Plus I don't have to worry about notching the pistons with AFR's. I see where Torque Monster headers now have a CARB #!! That's huge!! I hear good things about them. When I looked at them, I was a bit disappointed. But numbers don't lie. A tune wouldn't be necessary with what I have planned, but adjusting the timing on these engines nets huge improvements. I can do that with or without a tune.
Anyway, thanks for listening and I would appreciate any feedback or comments you may have. Great place you guys have here!
I've been lurking around these parts for a while and taking advantage of all the knowledge base here. I finally stepped up and joined not too long ago. I've been a Ford guy all my life...and my mom owned a Ford dealership for many years until she retired and I decided to pursue something different with my life. I wonder about that decision sometimes...
Anyway, I picked up a well used 1995 EB 4X4 with a 4.0 OHV in it. That will just not do. The reason I picked this one up is it was dirt cheap, and is in outstanding condition. 160,000 on the clock and you can eat off the bottom of this thing. You gotta love Arizona... Interior is really good, drives nice, etc. A great place to start...and that's my whole intention of buying it. It's a project. But as you can see by my name, I'm used to just a bit more performance than I have with this thing right now. So here comes the swap. Now, I've done several swaps in my life. Both Ford and GM (mods...please excuse my language and I'll do my best to clean that up in the future) All my conversions have been successful. However, this one is a bit different. I will be going from EEC-IV (OBD-I) to EEC-V (OBD-II). Furthermore, since I live in Arizona, this absolutely needs to be a 100% legal swap. To make it legal, it has to be offered from the factory and EVERYTHING has to be swapped (emissions wise). You can go UP in years, you just can't go down. In otherwords, I can go to a newer calibration than 95. Which is a no brainer since the 5.0 didn't come out until 96. So I'm going to locate and purchase a donor vehicle. Here's where my questions start. I'm not sure what year is the best to go with. I'm thinking a 96 would be the easiest because it's the closest to what I have. But is that true? I also know I'm going to have some interface issues to deal with. For example, the Message Center has a separate wire used for 5.0's. Will I need a 5.0 Message Center? Will the V6 tach work? Or will I need a V8 tach? Maybe just a V8 printed circuit for the cluster? When does PATS get involved? (I should know that one...) Questions, questions...
My goal is somewhere around 280 to 300 hp at the wheels. That should be like falling off a log. A set of AFR 165 or 180 heads, slight cam improvement, headers and exhaust, should get you real close and have impeccable street manners. I don't care what anyone says...AFR makes the best cylinder head for street use there is. Period. I've tried most of them, and they always come out on top. TFS heads are very good, but I've encountered some detonation problems I don't get with AFR's. Plus I don't have to worry about notching the pistons with AFR's. I see where Torque Monster headers now have a CARB #!! That's huge!! I hear good things about them. When I looked at them, I was a bit disappointed. But numbers don't lie. A tune wouldn't be necessary with what I have planned, but adjusting the timing on these engines nets huge improvements. I can do that with or without a tune.
Anyway, thanks for listening and I would appreciate any feedback or comments you may have. Great place you guys have here!