JOHN V.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- November 13, 2002
- Messages
- 517
- Reaction score
- 1
- City, State
- RICHMOND.CA.
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- 1994 XLT
As you all know, we have installed one of our 4.0 SOHC superchargers on a vehicle and have done some initial testing. We are happy with the function and installation of the kit. It fits and works well. The first dyno test on a stock Ranger 4x4 with stock exhaust and intake proved an additional sixty horsepower at the rear wheels. We did this initial test on a stock vehicle so we could have a base line from which to work. We did'nt really expect to bolt on the supercharger and start shipping out kits. We knew that testing and tuning would be required. We learned a lot from the test. We now know the M62 Eaton blower is good for 7PSI of boost. Our goal for a stock engine is 5.5-6 PSI. There is a limit to the amount of boost this engine will take. We're building this kit for all comers, but we also want to satisfy those who want the ultimate in torque and power. The sixty horsepower increase is just the beginning. We also learned that an intake upgrade is good for about fifteen horsepower. My brother, Dave, is busy working on our own intake upgrade that will be part of the kit. We also know that the exhaust is worth a significant amount of power. The exhaust will be changed before the next test date. We did the testing at the JBA Racing facility in San Diego with Pete Campbell from www.fordchip.com supervising. JBA also has tweeked out Mustangs and other modern muscle cars sitting around (cool place). They use a DynoMax dyno which is said give more conservative numbers (20% less) than the other commonly used dyno (Dynojet). The DynoMax tests differently than the DynoJet. It is different, not inferior. Pete Campbell likes the Dyno Max because it works better for tuning. He recommends running it on a DynoJet when all of the tuning is complete. We trust this guy. His knowledge is invaluable. He does tuning for supercharger companies like Kenny Bell and Allen Engineering. He knows how to dial in computer chips for supercharged applications. We believe that testing the intake and exhaust on a DynoJet will give us more realistic numbers. This should complete the supercharger kit. We want this kit to make a significant difference and still be affordable. We do not want to have to add alcohol injection, replace the hood, or have to build an engine that would handle 9 psi of boost. None of those are options at this point. Horsepower numbers are a big part of our goal. This is why we are taking the time and energy to get it right. The numbers are only part of the picture. This kit offers great drivability and the low end power the SOHC needs, and will only get better. I drove the test vehicle down to San Diego from Northern Ca. It begs for a different exhaust system! I can't wait to try it with one! What exhaust system do you guys prefer for the best power? I can only imagine what the headers will do for it. I motored up the Grapevine (a steep mountain pass outside of L.A.) passing cars at 70-80 mph with no problem. The next level is larger MAF and injectors with a different computer chip specific to those upgrades. We want to keep the price down on the upgrade. It depends on the need for a different fuel pump. We can get more fuel pressure from the chip, but there is a limit. We'll do more testing while we're waiting for the final production pieces to arrive. We are looking for your feedback. Once we figure out what the upgrade will be, and how much it will cost, we'll let you know. The upgrade will leave nothing to your imagination. No experimenting or "trial and error" will be required on your part. We will take care of the testing. We want you to tell us if you think it's worth the extra expense. We will want your opinion. We know that some of you have spent some serious money trying to get real power. This web site is a valuable resource for us to tap into. We value your opinion. We have another test date with Pete Campbell at the end of the month. We plan on using the information we've gained to make the necessary changes and then test it again. We are walking a fine line between cost/performance/reliability. It's a tough road but we are dedicated to it. With your help we can get the results we all want.
John Vanek,
Explorer Express
John Vanek,
Explorer Express