I don't want to get sucked into this too deeply since I've already participated in several discussions about it and it gets a little old running over old busines for the umpteenth time, so this will be all I have to say, but I hope it clarifies what the issue is.
Certainly it is a free country and we cannot tell anyone not to come. But those who didn't bother to register in time and decide to show up anyway do pose an additional risk to all of the rest of the participants (who took the trouble to do it right and register) to get hit with a substantial fee. I am not sure I would want to be the latecomer that shows up for a run and has to tell 30 other people that they all just spent another one or two hundred dollars each just because of me.
I don't know if the threads still exist from last year, but several pages of discussion surrounded this issue. The resulting decision was made with much anguish and knashing of teeth but was based on the best info we have. As I have already stated, my personal wish is to make this a huge event, but we are "inbetweeners" -- too small to be big and too big to be small. The fee would kill us and result in even less than thirty being able to come. Now to answer:
1) We are a group, no matter how much we try to wink and deny it. Last year we joked about putting J**p emblems on our vehicles, coming in disguise, etc; but the fact remains that several dozen modified Explorers all showing up in Moab at the same time -- most with "www.explorer4x4.com" stickers on them -- will stand out in a tiny town (the town of Moab consists of maybe a three mile long main street with few side streets and nothing else). The area is huge, but the town is tiny. When you roll in the locals know it.
2) Contacts were made with authorities and also local high-profile guides both in Utah and California. The authorities all provided conflicting information and none could be nailed down to an exact definition of "group", nor of the amount of vehicles that would define a "group", nor of how many thousands of dollars would be an appropriate fee to charge that "group". Expert opinion from the professional guides and others all advised us NOT to contact the BLM and to just show up and try to maintain a low profile.
3) Unless and until we can get a concrete ruling on what constitutes a group, or can get so many participants that it wouldn't matter (100+), we're just trying to do the best we can.
Anime4x4, everything you said makes perfect sense and has already been said by all of us, but you forget that we are dealing with government beaurocrats who are woefully lacking in that common sense dept. That is one of the aspects that makes this entire situation so frustrating.
Like I said, this all sucks, but we're having to live with it at this point. I will say that I am planning further contact with the BLM again to see if the climate has changed in the last year. As this is being written we are still under the veil of Klintonesque landgrabbbing tyranny and I do not hold high hopes for a change of heart. It will take quite awhile for a Bush administration to effect a tangible change in the current climate.
4) The safety issue. Last year some paid out of their own pocket to hire guides and learn the trails before the run. Others arrived days early and/or purchased GPS to map out preruns. Each run needs a qualified Trailboss and Tailgunner. In Colorado we also had a medical EMT in each group. We simply do not at this time have the resources to lead a half dozen groups simultaneously on the trails.
None of this is wanted by any of us. I'd love to see 100 of us together at once. Lots of things in life ain't fair, and this is one of them. Figuring out a way to make Moab the major event has been at the top of my mind all year. Right now though, it just can't happen.
Maybe for this year we could also schedule an autumn Moab run??? Just throwing an idea out. Would require drivers willing to do the same as we did and prerun and scout trails and prepare, etc.
[Edited by GJarrett on 01-11-2001 at 09:19 PM]