rocket 5979
Resident Gearhead
- Joined
- April 22, 2002
- Messages
- 3,994
- Reaction score
- 12
- City, State
- Lake Villa, Illinois
- Year, Model & Trim Level
- '03 XLT 4.6
JDraper said:I think the Mach will be faster than a 450-500 crank Hp Explorer because of the weight difference, suspension difference and the wonderful torque curve of the 32 valve motor..I haven't had my Mach on the track with it's current setup, but I've seen other Mach's with equivalent setups running mid 12's at around 117 in the 1/4. (I need to modify the driver to get results that good
) I've dyno'd at 302 rwhp and 327 rwtq corrected. All I've got are a C&L CAI, Borla cat back, PHP intake spacer, Meziere electric water pump and a custom tune. Those mods on the Mach go for about $1200.
With the mods she has outlined that X will be making more than just 500 at the crank..... Well,.....with the mods I outlined for her. You talked about a used Mach. Stocker Mach's are high 13 second cars in most average hands and usually are low 14 second cars in a not so skilled drivers hands so an X with even 450 at the crank will be be able to take one out given similarly skilled drivers.
Heck, back when my Explorer was detuned it was only making 450 at the crank and still ran 13.6 on the stocker A/T's with 1.9 60'. With DR's it would have been 13.3-13.4 no problem. Now factor in a lighter generation Explorer with a solid rear axle (better launching) and a little more power than what I was making and you got 12's no problem. Stock Mach 1 killer? Yes. Lightly modded Mach 1 killer? Yes. Full bolt on Mach killer? Heck no! The Mach, like any other Mustang will go faster for less money but in the end it is still a run of the mill Mustang. Don't get me wrong, I love my Mustang's, just the plain truth is that they aren't anything really unique or special. A 12 second Explorer is just a little more unique and interesting than a 12 second Mach. Both are respectable, but to each their own.