034x4's D44 SAS thread... | Page 30 | Ford Explorer Forums

  • Register Today It's free!

034x4's D44 SAS thread...

I'm not sure exactly, i think its around 5-8*. It points directly at the t-case at ride height. I had to cut and turn the knuckles so I could get high steer to clear the leafs. I have about 11* of caster. It's nasty. One of the main reasons i'm going to a 3 link so I don't have to clear leafs.
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





034x4 said:
I'm not sure exactly, i think its around 5-8*. It points directly at the t-case at ride height. I had to cut and turn the knuckles so I could get high steer to clear the leafs. I have about 11* of caster. It's nasty. One of the main reasons i'm going to a 3 link so I don't have to clear leafs.
so I guess my next question is - whats the ideal caster angle you're aiming for?
my stock Grand Wago axle I has 10* of caster
 






10* thats not right. You want 5-7* for a waggy axle. You have to take into consideration the spring perches are not at 0*.
 






yeah you're right - i assumed the pinion sat perfectly horizontal
 






I have somwhere between 7-9* of caster on my waggy front end. I used the sky-mfg arm for my cross over because it is taller then most other arms out there so that I knew it would clear the springs.
 






where the pics of that wheeling trip you went on a couple weeks back ?
 












I just saw them Daaaamn is all i can say. You did good on that ranger.
 






There is also a thread about tellico called : tellico pics.

Did some work today.

Let the ignoramous posts begin!

04-19-06_1202.jpg


04-19-06_1203.jpg


04-19-06_1204.jpg


04-19-06_1205.jpg


04-19-06_1232.jpg


04-19-06_1233.jpg


It sits level now and leans ALOT less, woohoo.

04-19-06_1338.jpg
 






interesting! Bet you can't sneak up on anyone on a trail now though!!!

You plan to put some sort of padding or anything on the contact point?
 












wow that flex joint shackle thingah mah jig is ingenous. Your truck is a SAS role model. ( bowwing to you) I am not worthy!
 






oh yea i think i figured out what that new front axle might be..... :cool:
 






haha wow, can you lock it for driving on the street?

also what if the arm ever flattened out at the elbow there and the shackle got inverted, might that cause some problems?
 






The shackle won't invert, the front hanger will bottom out on the control arm before it has enough down travel to invert the shackle.

Drove it on the street today and it doesn't even come off of the stops under hard braking. I might put some rubber/polyurethane type stop eventually but this is working so far so good.
 






smashing idea .. kinda like a 3/4 ellipitcal but not :confused:
what would you call that cantilever thingimajig of a design?
 






when that flexes doesnt the axle move forward or backward ? how exactly and what are those made of ?
 






JS91X said:
when that flexes doesnt the axle move forward or backward ? how exactly and what are those made of ?
the axle always moves backward and foward during flex, thats why theres a slip joint/yoke on the driveshaft. this design doesnt change the arch that the axle makes - its the same (the front pivot point of the leaf spring)
 






well i was meaning if it would move too far back and the drive shaft slip out of the yoke
 



Join the Elite Explorers for $20 each year or try it out for $5 a month.

Elite Explorer members see no advertisements, no banner ads, no double underlined links,.
Add an avatar, upload photo attachments, and more!
.





JS91X said:
well i was meaning if it would move too far back and the drive shaft slip out of the yoke
this has happened before to 034x4, there was a pic a few pages back of the disconnected driveshaft halves.. but thats why ppl get longer driveshafts and slip yokes with longer travel (034x4 said the driveshaft shop didnt make his driveshaft long enough - hence the disconnect).
 






Featured Content

Back
Top